{"id":732,"date":"2021-10-07T14:38:27","date_gmt":"2021-10-07T13:38:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/?page_id=732"},"modified":"2021-10-08T12:04:44","modified_gmt":"2021-10-08T11:04:44","slug":"recordings-of-the-webinar","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/events\/webinar1\/recordings-of-the-webinar\/","title":{"rendered":"Recordings of the webinar"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>SESSION 1: EVIDENCE IN DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS (Chair: Mr Michael O&#8217;Boyle)<\/strong><br><em>Kristin Henrard- &#8220;Sharing of the burden of proof in cases on racial discrimination before the ECtHR: a mixed account&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/nPhUZwzS-OE\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Katarzyna S\u0119kowska-Kozlowska- &#8220;When is domestic violence discriminatory? From Opuz v Turkey to Volodina v Russia&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/qhZcC2v5jEw\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>SESSION 2: NEW EVIDENTIARY CHALLENGES (Chair: Prof Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour)<br><\/strong><em>Nele Schuldt- &#8220;Evidence in climate change litigation before the ECtHR&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/5NSIL1N8dAM\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Joseph Finnerty- &#8220;Conspiracies and the Convention: How does an applicant prove a state&#8217;s ulterior motives under Article 18 of the ECHR?&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/V81bxuxcO50\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>SESSION 3: EVIDENCE AND STATE SECRECY (Chair: Ms Nina Kolowratnik)<\/strong><br><em>Gra\u017cyna Baranowska- &#8220;Substantiating claims of secret migrant detention at the ECtHR&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/UMiSBtJvQIs\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Jasmine Sommardal- &#8220;Considerations which the Court is not well equipped to challenge? &#8211; The obligation of Contracting Parties to produce national security evidence before the ECtHR&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/orVc9mKF9pU\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>CLOSING SESSION<br><\/strong><em>Anne-Katrin Speck- &#8220;Concluding remarks&#8221;.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"560\" height=\"315\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/T_R_0MSH4j8\" title=\"YouTube video player\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen=\"\"><\/iframe>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>SESSION 1: EVIDENCE IN DISCRIMINATION COMPLAINTS (Chair: Mr Michael O&#8217;Boyle)Kristin Henrard- &#8220;Sharing of the burden of proof in cases on racial discrimination before the ECtHR: a mixed account&#8221;. Katarzyna S\u0119kowska-Kozlowska- &#8220;When is domestic violence discriminatory? From Opuz v Turkey to Volodina v Russia&#8221;. SESSION 2: NEW EVIDENTIARY CHALLENGES (Chair: Prof Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour)Nele Schuldt- &#8220;Evidence in<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/events\/webinar1\/recordings-of-the-webinar\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Recordings of the webinar&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":712,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-732","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=732"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":760,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/732\/revisions\/760"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/712"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}