{"id":818,"date":"2022-02-23T14:45:20","date_gmt":"2022-02-23T13:45:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/?page_id=818"},"modified":"2023-05-02T01:11:51","modified_gmt":"2023-05-02T00:11:51","slug":"blog","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/blog\/","title":{"rendered":"DISSECT Blog"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-columns is-layout-flex wp-container-core-columns-is-layout-9d6595d7 wp-block-columns-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-vertically-aligned-top is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:50%\"><div class=\"wp-block-archives-dropdown wp-block-archives\"><label for=\"wp-block-archives-1\" class=\"wp-block-archives__label\">Archivos<\/label>\n\t\t<select id=\"wp-block-archives-1\" name=\"archive-dropdown\">\n\t\t<option value=\"\">Elegir mes<\/option>\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2026\/04\/'> abril 2026 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2025\/11\/'> noviembre 2025 &nbsp;(2)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2025\/07\/'> julio 2025 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2025\/04\/'> abril 2025 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/11\/'> noviembre 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/10\/'> octubre 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/07\/'> julio 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/05\/'> mayo 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/04\/'> abril 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/03\/'> marzo 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/02\/'> febrero 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2023\/01\/'> enero 2023 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/12\/'> diciembre 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/11\/'> noviembre 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/10\/'> octubre 2022 &nbsp;(2)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/06\/'> junio 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/05\/'> mayo 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/04\/'> abril 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n\t<option value='https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/2022\/03\/'> marzo 2022 &nbsp;(1)<\/option>\n<\/select><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n( ( [ dropdownId, homeUrl ] ) => {\n\t\tconst dropdown = document.getElementById( dropdownId );\n\t\tfunction onSelectChange() {\n\t\t\tsetTimeout( () => {\n\t\t\t\tif ( 'escape' === dropdown.dataset.lastkey ) {\n\t\t\t\t\treturn;\n\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t\tif ( dropdown.value ) {\n\t\t\t\t\tlocation.href = dropdown.value;\n\t\t\t\t}\n\t\t\t}, 250 );\n\t\t}\n\t\tfunction onKeyUp( event ) {\n\t\t\tif ( 'Escape' === event.key ) {\n\t\t\t\tdropdown.dataset.lastkey = 'escape';\n\t\t\t} else {\n\t\t\t\tdelete dropdown.dataset.lastkey;\n\t\t\t}\n\t\t}\n\t\tfunction onClick() {\n\t\t\tdelete dropdown.dataset.lastkey;\n\t\t}\n\t\tdropdown.addEventListener( 'keyup', onKeyUp );\n\t\tdropdown.addEventListener( 'click', onClick );\n\t\tdropdown.addEventListener( 'change', onSelectChange );\n\t} )( [\"wp-block-archives-1\",\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\"] );\n\/\/# sourceURL=block_core_archives_build_dropdown_script\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-column is-layout-flow wp-block-column-is-layout-flow\" style=\"flex-basis:50%\"><form role=\"search\" method=\"get\" action=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/\" class=\"wp-block-search__button-outside wp-block-search__icon-button wp-block-search\"    ><label class=\"wp-block-search__label screen-reader-text\" for=\"wp-block-search__input-2\" >Buscar<\/label><div class=\"wp-block-search__inside-wrapper\"  style=\"width: 100%\"><input class=\"wp-block-search__input\" id=\"wp-block-search__input-2\" placeholder=\"\" value=\"\" type=\"search\" name=\"s\" required \/><button aria-label=\"Search\" class=\"wp-block-search__button has-icon wp-element-button\" type=\"submit\" ><svg class=\"search-icon\" viewBox=\"0 0 24 24\" width=\"24\" height=\"24\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<path d=\"M13 5c-3.3 0-6 2.7-6 6 0 1.4.5 2.7 1.3 3.7l-3.8 3.8 1.1 1.1 3.8-3.8c1 .8 2.3 1.3 3.7 1.3 3.3 0 6-2.7 6-6S16.3 5 13 5zm0 10.5c-2.5 0-4.5-2-4.5-4.5s2-4.5 4.5-4.5 4.5 2 4.5 4.5-2 4.5-4.5 4.5z\"><\/path>\n\t\t\t\t<\/svg><\/button><\/div><\/form><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__list has-dates alignwide wp-block-latest-posts\"><li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/new-book-announcement-questions-of-evidence-in-the-un-human-rights-treaty-bodies-individual-communications-procedure\/\">New Book Announcement: Questions of Evidence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies&#8217; Individual Communications Procedure<\/a><time datetime=\"2026-04-16T17:01:58+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">04\/16\/2026<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">We are delighted to announce the publication of the DISSECT project&#8217;s latest book: Questions of Evidence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies&#8217; Individual Communications Procedure, edited by Deborah Casalin (University of Antwerp), Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour (Ghent University), and Cornelia Klocker (Ghent University). This volume is the first in-depth analysis of the evidentiary regimes developed within<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/new-book-announcement-questions-of-evidence-in-the-un-human-rights-treaty-bodies-individual-communications-procedure\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;New Book Announcement: Questions of Evidence in the UN Human Rights Treaty Bodies&#8217; Individual Communications Procedure&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/mapping-out-the-requirements-of-a-phd\/\">Mapping out the Requirements of a PhD<\/a><time datetime=\"2025-11-10T15:56:17+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">11\/10\/2025<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour This post is not about evidence in international human rights adjudication, but about what examiners are looking for in a PhD (whatever the discipline). It links to a recording where, powerpoint click by powerpoint click, I explain what doctoral examiners are looking for &#8211; and thus what you as a doctoral student should<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/mapping-out-the-requirements-of-a-phd\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Mapping out the Requirements of a PhD&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/the-evidentiary-practice-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-critical-reflections-on-its-historical-institutional-and-political-underpinnings-anne-heinisch\/\">PhD Thesis: &#8220;The Evidentiary Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Reflections on its Historical, Institutional and Political Underpinnings&#8221;, Anne Heinisch<\/a><time datetime=\"2025-11-07T11:49:17+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">11\/07\/2025<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">Fellow DISSECTer Anne Heinisch defended their PhD dissertation titled &#8220;The Evidentiary Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Reflections on its Historical, Institutional and Political Underpinnings&#8221;. This presentation marked the opening of the public ceremony for their PhD defence, held at Ghent University on 2 September 2025. Abstract Facts form the foundation of<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/the-evidentiary-practice-of-the-european-court-of-human-rights-critical-reflections-on-its-historical-institutional-and-political-underpinnings-anne-heinisch\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;PhD Thesis: &#8220;The Evidentiary Practice of the European Court of Human Rights: Critical Reflections on its Historical, Institutional and Political Underpinnings&#8221;, Anne Heinisch&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/call-for-papers-for-our-pretoria-conference-11-13-may-2026-please-submit-your-abstract-by-30-september-2025\/\">Pretoria Conference, 11-13 May 2026 Please submit your abstract by 30 September 2025<\/a><time datetime=\"2025-07-18T10:21:38+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">07\/18\/2025<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">Celebrating, Reflecting, Connecting A Conference in honour of the 20th&nbsp;Anniversary of the African Court on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights,&nbsp;co-hosted by DISSECT: Evidence in International Human Rights Adjudication (ERC, Ghent University) and the Centre for Human Rights and NRF Chair in International Constitutional Law, University of Pretoria Evidence Matters Before Regional Human Rights Courts: The African<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/call-for-papers-for-our-pretoria-conference-11-13-may-2026-please-submit-your-abstract-by-30-september-2025\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Pretoria Conference, 11-13 May 2026 Please submit your abstract by 30 September 2025&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/evidencing-pushbacks-at-borders-of-coe-member-states-third-party-intervention-in-a-a-n-and-others-v-greece\/\">Evidencing Pushbacks at borders of CoE Member States: Third Party Intervention in A.A.N. and Others v. Greece<\/a><time datetime=\"2025-04-18T09:00:32+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">04\/18\/2025<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Gra\u017cyna Baranowska1, Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour2 and Isabel Kienzle3 This post, an output of the DISSECT\u2019s project, is concomitantly being published on the Strasbourg Observers blog. Regularly operated at many borders of CoE member states, pushbacks are problematic practices from a human rights perspective. They generally violate the principle of non-refoulement under Article 3 ECHR as<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/evidencing-pushbacks-at-borders-of-coe-member-states-third-party-intervention-in-a-a-n-and-others-v-greece\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Evidencing Pushbacks at borders of CoE Member States: Third Party Intervention in A.A.N. and Others v. Greece&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/pushing-states-to-evidence-pushbacks\/\">Pushing states to evidence pushbacks: Lessons from MH v. Croatia for intersecting domestic criminal law and international human rights<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-11-06T08:01:00+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">11\/06\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Irina Fehr1 and Jill Alpes2 A &#8216;pushback&#8217; refers to the forcible expulsion of individuals from a country without considering their specific circumstances, denying them the chance to seek international protection, often accompanied by violence and excessive force. Although pushback practices may also constitute crimes, human rights-based pushback litigation is predominant. In this blogpost, we<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/pushing-states-to-evidence-pushbacks\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Pushing states to evidence pushbacks: Lessons from MH v. Croatia for intersecting domestic criminal law and international human rights&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/bodi-and-others-v-hungary\/\">B\u00f3di and Others v Hungary: when the Court\u2019s focus on the volume of procedures speaks volumes about its stance on antigypsyism<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-10-02T08:42:07+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">10\/02\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Emma V\u00e1rnagy [This post first appeared on Strasbourg Observers] Introduction In this blog post, I discuss the case of B\u00f3di and Others v Hungary (App.no.29554\/17) declared inadmissible by the Court. The decision concerns the investigation of an anti-Roma hate crime with the potential involvement of a police officer. It is a disappointing decision because<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/bodi-and-others-v-hungary\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;B\u00f3di and Others v Hungary: when the Court\u2019s focus on the volume of procedures speaks volumes about its stance on antigypsyism&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/scientific-evidence-in-strasbourgs-environmental-jurisprudence-through-the-prism-of-ilva-taranto\/\">Scientific evidence in Strasbourg\u2019s environmental jurisprudence through the prism of Ilva Taranto<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-07-03T12:22:39+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">07\/03\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By: Jozef Seghers* 1.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Introduction Ilva Taranto is Europe\u2019s largest steel plant, and its travails have given rise to commensurate amounts of legislation and court cases. In the past few weeks, the plant has been in the news in Italy once more, as the government wrangled with the private shareholders over yet another investment plan,<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/scientific-evidence-in-strasbourgs-environmental-jurisprudence-through-the-prism-of-ilva-taranto\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Scientific evidence in Strasbourg\u2019s environmental jurisprudence through the prism of Ilva Taranto&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/reflections-on-the-symposium\/\">Evidence between expertise and expedience: Reflections on the symposium \u2018Evidentiary regimes of UN Treaty Bodies: Perspectives from research and practice\u2019 (Ghent, 15-16 May 2023)<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-05-29T20:27:33+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">05\/29\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Erg\u00fcn Cakal* DISSECT hosted a two-day symposium on \u2018Evidentiary regimes of UN Treaty Bodies\u2019 (UNTBs) between 15-16 May 2023, at Ghent University. It brought together 20 participants who each presented and discussed a paper on research or practice around the use of evidence in different treaty bodies, upon the backdrop of the potentials and<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/reflections-on-the-symposium\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Evidence between expertise and expedience: Reflections on the symposium \u2018Evidentiary regimes of UN Treaty Bodies: Perspectives from research and practice\u2019 (Ghent, 15-16 May 2023)&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/busqueda-guzman-medina\/\">Desaf\u00edos probatorios sobre el derecho de toda persona a ser buscada en el Sistema Interamericano: el caso Guzm\u00e1n Medina y otros vs. Colombia<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-04-30T21:47:31+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">04\/30\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">Por Genaro A. Manrique Giacom\u00e1n* Introducci\u00f3n En septiembre de 2021, la Comisi\u00f3n Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (CIDH) someti\u00f3 a la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH) el caso Guzm\u00e1n Medina y otros vs. Colombia[1]. Este caso trata sobre la desaparici\u00f3n de Arles Edisson Guzm\u00e1n Medina ocurrida en Medell\u00edn el 30 de noviembre de 2002,<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/busqueda-guzman-medina\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Desaf\u00edos probatorios sobre el derecho de toda persona a ser buscada en el Sistema Interamericano: el caso Guzm\u00e1n Medina y otros vs. Colombia&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/machalikashvili-and-others-v-georgia\/\">Machalikashvili and Others V. Georgia: The Critical Importance of the Burden and Standard of Proof to Human Rights Adjudication<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-03-21T11:22:43+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">03\/21\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By\u00a0Prof. Christopher Roberts [This post first appeared on\u00a0Strasbourg Observers] Machalikashvili and Others v. Georgia&nbsp;concerned the killing of T.M. by members of the Counter-Terrorism Department of the State Security Service (\u2018SSS\u2019) of Georgia on 26 December 2017. The precise circumstances in which this killing took place, as well as the integrity and comprehensiveness of the investigation<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/machalikashvili-and-others-v-georgia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Machalikashvili and Others V. Georgia: The Critical Importance of the Burden and Standard of Proof to Human Rights Adjudication&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/symposium-on-fairness-equality-and-diversity\/\">Re-Imagining Standards of Fairness in Open Source Investigations: A Commentary on Fact-finding in the Tigray Conflict<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-02-28T14:20:09+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">02\/28\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">DISSECT is very pleased to report that members of the team Ruwadzano Patience Makumbe and Edward Kahuthia Murimi have co-authored a blog post which Opinio Juris has published as part of its Symposium on Fairness, Equality, and Diversity in Open Source Investigations. Their post problematises the use of digital open source evidence and interrogates the<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/symposium-on-fairness-equality-and-diversity\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Re-Imagining Standards of Fairness in Open Source Investigations: A Commentary on Fact-finding in the Tigray Conflict&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/seeing-it-with-your-own-eyes\/\">\u2018Seeing it with your own eyes\u2019: The value and limits of the Inter-American Court\u2019s in-situ visits to Indigenous communities<\/a><time datetime=\"2023-01-31T23:51:53+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">01\/31\/2023<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Nina Kolowratnik* On the 23rd of August 2022, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (the Court) held a public hearing in the case Pueblos Ind\u00edgenas Tagaeri y Taromenane v. Ecuador (Tagaeri Taromenane). The Waorani community of the Amazonian rainforest seized the moment to invite the Court to visit their Indigenous homeland and see for<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/seeing-it-with-your-own-eyes\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;\u2018Seeing it with your own eyes\u2019: The value and limits of the Inter-American Court\u2019s in-situ visits to Indigenous communities&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/pavlov-v-russia-welcoming-the-courts-proactive-shift-in-its-handling-of-environmental-complaints-including-their-evidentiary-challenges\/\">Pavlov v. Russia: Welcoming the Court&#8217;s proactive shift in its handling of environmental complaints, including their evidentiary challenges*<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-12-02T12:52:20+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">12\/02\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By&nbsp;Nele Schuldt [This post first appeared on&nbsp;Strasbourg Observers] IntroductionOn October 11th\u00a02022, the third section of the Strasbourg Court delivered an important judgment in the case of\u00a0Pavlov and Others v Russia\u00a0(Application no. 31612\/09), concerning air pollution, which will hopefully prove to have great ramifications for pending and future environmental and climate cases. In short, the majority<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/pavlov-v-russia-welcoming-the-courts-proactive-shift-in-its-handling-of-environmental-complaints-including-their-evidentiary-challenges\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Pavlov v. Russia: Welcoming the Court&#8217;s proactive shift in its handling of environmental complaints, including their evidentiary challenges*&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/applying-an-evidentiary-lens-to-the-conflict-in-ethiopia-issues-arising-from-investigative-mandates\/\">Applying an Evidentiary Lens to the Conflict in Ethiopia: Issues Arising from Investigative Mandates<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-11-03T15:02:38+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">11\/03\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Edward Kahuthia Murimi &amp; Ruwadzano Makumbe Introduction The war in Tigray has unleashed untold suffering for the people in the region. According to the reports of the Joint Investigative Team (JIT) of OHCHR and the Ethiopian Human Rights Commission (November 2021) and the International Commission of Human Rights Experts on Ethiopia (ICHREE or \u2018the<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/applying-an-evidentiary-lens-to-the-conflict-in-ethiopia-issues-arising-from-investigative-mandates\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Applying an Evidentiary Lens to the Conflict in Ethiopia: Issues Arising from Investigative Mandates&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/the-escape-of-the-state-no-shift-in-the-burden-of-the-proof-and-no-anti-roma-discrimination-by-the-police-in-p-h-v-slovakia\/\">The escape of the state: No shift in the burden of the proof and no anti-Roma discrimination by the police in P.H. v Slovakia<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-10-31T23:01:54+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">10\/31\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour Thanks to Emma V\u00e1rnagy whose insightful&nbsp;post on the P.H. case published on the Strasbourg Observers blog inspired me to write my own take on the case, and whose comments on my text helped improve it. Would you jump from a 7.7 metres high window? Of course not! Nobody would, although, according to<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/the-escape-of-the-state-no-shift-in-the-burden-of-the-proof-and-no-anti-roma-discrimination-by-the-police-in-p-h-v-slovakia\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;The escape of the state: No shift in the burden of the proof and no anti-Roma discrimination by the police in P.H. v Slovakia&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/p-h-v-slovakia-when-the-concept-of-discrimination-goes-out-the-window-at-the-strasbourg-court\/\">P.H. v Slovakia: When the concept of discrimination goes out the window at the Strasbourg Court*<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-10-19T08:59:07+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">10\/19\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Emma V\u00e1rnagy [This post first appeared on Strasbourg Observers] The case of P.H. v Slovakia (Application no 37574\/19) is at least the eleventh case before the Strasbourg Court in which it is confronted with the mysterious fall of a person from a police station window. It is the seventh case where questions of discrimination<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/p-h-v-slovakia-when-the-concept-of-discrimination-goes-out-the-window-at-the-strasbourg-court\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;P.H. v Slovakia: When the concept of discrimination goes out the window at the Strasbourg Court*&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/how-long-is-not-too-long-before-filing-an-application-at-the-african-court-evidentiary-challenges-for-incarcerated-applicants\/\">How long is (not) too long before filing an application at the African Court? Evidentiary challenges for incarcerated applicants<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-06-20T08:27:47+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">06\/20\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Edward Kahuthia Murimi Typically, international human rights courts and bodies require applicants to meet various requirements for their applications to be deemed admissible. At the African Court on Human and Peoples\u2019 Rights (hereafter, African Court or Court) one requirement is that the application must be submitted \u2018within a reasonable time from the date local<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/how-long-is-not-too-long-before-filing-an-application-at-the-african-court-evidentiary-challenges-for-incarcerated-applicants\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;How long is (not) too long before filing an application at the African Court? Evidentiary challenges for incarcerated applicants&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/why-the-european-court-of-human-rights-would-do-well-to-start-using-stereotypes-as-evidence-a-critique-of-the-strasbourg-approach-to-anti-roma-police-violence-cases\/\">Why the European Court of Human Rights Would Do Well to Start Using Stereotypes as Evidence \u2013 A Critique of the Strasbourg Approach to Anti-Roma Police Violence Cases<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-05-30T11:35:00+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">05\/30\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Emma V\u00e1rnagy This post is based on a paper which I am thankful to have had the opportunity to present at the \u2018Critical Approaches to Romani Studies Conference\u2019 on 18 May 2022 organized by S\u00f6dert\u00f6rn University and Central European University. I am also grateful to my doctoral supervisor, Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour, for generously commenting on<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/why-the-european-court-of-human-rights-would-do-well-to-start-using-stereotypes-as-evidence-a-critique-of-the-strasbourg-approach-to-anti-roma-police-violence-cases\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Why the European Court of Human Rights Would Do Well to Start Using Stereotypes as Evidence \u2013 A Critique of the Strasbourg Approach to Anti-Roma Police Violence Cases&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/russia-and-the-strasbourg-court\/\">Russia and the Strasbourg Court: evidentiary challenges arising from Russia\u2019s expulsion from the Council of Europe<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-04-29T16:18:32+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">04\/29\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Anne-Katrin Speck* Introduction It has been two months since Europe woke up to the horrific news that Russia had launched a brutal invasion of neighbouring Ukraine\u2014two months during which Ukraine has seen immeasurable suffering and destruction, and two months which have dramatically changed Europe\u2019s human rights landscape. It is no exaggeration to state that<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/russia-and-the-strasbourg-court\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;Russia and the Strasbourg Court: evidentiary challenges arising from Russia\u2019s expulsion from the Council of Europe&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<li><a class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-title\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/first-thoughts-on-truth\/\">First Thoughts on \u2018Truth\u2019 in Human Rights Adjudication<\/a><time datetime=\"2022-03-31T16:42:25+01:00\" class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-date\">03\/31\/2022<\/time><div class=\"wp-block-latest-posts__post-excerpt\">By Marie-B\u00e9n\u00e9dicte Dembour, Ruwadzano Makumbe and Genaro Manrique For 18 months now, the DISSECT research project has started to explore evidence in international human rights adjudication. Focusing on the interplay between truth, power and evidence, one of its core questions is how the judicial process tries to eliminate but keeps having to deal with factual<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/first-thoughts-on-truth\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">&#8220;First Thoughts on \u2018Truth\u2019 in Human Rights Adjudication&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/div><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-818","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry","entry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/818","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=818"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/818\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1453,"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/818\/revisions\/1453"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dissect.ugent.be\/es\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=818"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}